Why Don’t We Know – Blog Posts
November 16, 2020
Yet another public university is trying to silence students who work in campus housing from speaking out about their university’s handling of COVID-19 cases, even though both students and public employees have substantial First Amendment protection to speak about issues of public concern.
October 22, 2020
All across the country we’re seeing government offices of all shapes and sizes use the pandemic as an excuse not to respond to open records requests in a timely manner. We discuss this at length in this week’s bonus episode.
This example came across our desks after production for that episode wrapped up, and it’s worth a mention.
The Dallas school district has been telling reporters that they have an indefinite amount of time to respond to their open records requests because of COVID, even though Texas state law requires a response within 10 business days.
Instead of complying, the district has taken the position that they have no business days as long as employees are working from home.
The state attorney general has issued guidance that pretty much backs them up, too, saying that it’s ok not to count business days when working with a “skeleton staff.” Take a look.
October 1, 2020
September 16, 2020
In episode six, The Portal, we mentioned that North Carolina State’s current chancellor, Randy Woodsen, was chosen in a secret search. This is true of all North Carolina public university chancellors. Universities there have interpreted an open records law exemption related to public employee personal records to mean that university chancellor searches must be secret.
But, other positions at the university are often chosen through open, public searches.
In fact, one of the first things that Woodsen did at chancellor was to conduct a public search for a provost.
This highlights the fact that our research shows and our guests pointed out — that good, qualified candidates can be found in open searches.
Meanwhile… then entire UNC system is considering a change to its search process — allowing the system president to insert his or her own finalist, bypassing the board. It’s something that has drawn criticism from faculty.
September 7, 2020
As students return to campus amidst a global pandemic, news stories are popping up, citing the concerns of resident assistants in dormitories about how some universities are handling safety.
Almost all of the concerns are from RAs who are speaking anonymously, and almost all of the stories cite policies that prevent them from speaking on the record.
For example, at Southern Illinois University, RAs said they were upset about finding out in a chance encounter there was a COVID19 patient on their floor.
One RA told the student newspaper, The Daily Egyptian, “There are zero precautions in place that keep us safe.”
In Episode 2, we talked about how Brechner Center research found that public universities are unconstitutionally gagging the rights of student athletes by making rules that they can’t speak to the media. Similar research has found that this is a problem for resident assistants too.
Of the 20 public universities where we were able to obtain policies, we found at least 11 were problematic, saying things like “do not speak with any media” and “call the department head if the media has questions.”
The worst example we found was at East Carolina University, where the RA contract says the director must be told of all media contacts “even in a personal unofficial role.”
“Yes, that’s all automatically going to be a violation of the First Amendment,” said Louis Clark, executive director of the Government Accountability Project. “You have the freedom of speech. You’re working for a public university. If this public university ends up essentially directing you, that you cannot speak publicly about anything related to the job, then that, in and of itself, is a violation of the First Amendment because they’re the government and the First Amendment is directed at the government.”
While these policies have been around for a while, the coronavirus highlights why this is bad policy.
“RAs are not just employees talking about their workplace, but they’re students talking about their home,” said Adam Steinbaugh, the director of the Individual Rights Defense Program at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
“The broader world is struggling to respond to the pandemic,” he said. “Institutions of higher education are not islands in dealing with that. I think it’s important that institutions, especially institutions of higher education, be able to allow people to voice those concerns.”
We used public records requests to obtain these policies and the policy that we received from the University of Florida had previously been marked before it was handed over.
A highlighted portion reads that a resident assistant, “is not allowed to speak to any member of the media unless requested or given permission to do so by a member of Senior Management.”
And below that, is additional text noting that the university “has probably violated that person’s First Amendment rights.”
It’s not clear who made that marking — all we know is that it was made before we got the document.
We asked the University of Florida if that policy still in place, but didn’t get an answer.
“This is a bit of conjecture, but I assume they don’t want people speaking out, therefore they provide that instruction with the assumption that people are going to abide by that and won’t speak out even though it’s a matter of great public concern,” Clark said. “Institutions tend to want to control information. And so therefore they do often in promulgating policies that they assume people will abide by even if they’re unconstitutional.”
August 28, 2020
In Episode 2, we revealed that many major universities have unconstitutional policies, gagging the rights of student athletes, and telling them that they cannot speak publicly without first getting permission.
This flies in the face of the First Amendment.
Monday, the University of Utah not only doubled down on their bad policy, but took it an extra step further, warning members of the press covering Utah Athletics that if they reach out to players without first asking permission, they could face “sanctions up to and including revocation of credentials.”
In addition, Utah tells reporters that the rule applies to “their family members,” and that reaching out even though social media is prohibited.
“Full compliance with the above policies is a requirement for access and credentials to cover Utah Athletics. Access and credentials may be revoked for violation of stated policies” the email states.
Employees of public agencies have repeatedly challenged bans on unapproved contact with the news media — and they’ve won every single time, going back to a 1946 case against the New York City Fire Department. More than 20 times, federal judges have struck down government policies, like the one just circulated at Utah that tells public employees they can’t speak to journalists without approval.